Talking about all the old politics, in a single, very long article, would be impossible, and even difficult.
We will focus on some parties, which had ideologies, which in reality, due to the wickedness of the people, were not fully put into practice, but allowed some to obtain too much power and advantages that they did not deserve. You will have noticed that we, at this stage, in our public articles, on our official website, of DirectDemocracyS, hardly talk about individual political figures, we prefer, in our early stages, to focus above all on individual political forces, in a general way, but at the right time, our articles will contain names, and errors, of every single political party, and of every political figure. And everyone will have noticed that we limit ourselves to a few brief general considerations; for the details, you will have to wait for the specific articles.
In the continental, national, state and local phases, based on the various administrative subdivisions, and therefore, in our geographical and territorial phase, we will talk, in detail, about all the political parties, and about every single political representative, of every geographic area. Our study groups are doing complete and detailed work on the old policy.
Those who know us know that we don't like to "speak badly" of others, to obtain consensus, we only do it, to make everyone understand, the large quantity of injustices and mistakes, which we would never have made, for the simple reason, that in DirectDemocracyS, we were created, and we were conceived, from the first second of our lives, to be perfect. Don't tell us, as you often do, that perfection doesn't exist. You would be wrong. If whoever creates a political project thinks, in all his activities, first, of the good of the entire world population, always asking himself if each of our choices is in everyone's interest, perfection becomes complete and infallible. Perfection is created by never trying, and for any reason, to favor or prefer someone by disadvantaging someone else.
We, in DirectDemocracyS, see politics as a means to positively solve all the problems of all people, and not to earn money, wealth and power. If we have money, wealth, and power, with our hard work, we will share it, with anyone who joins us, and we will use it, for the good of all. The other political forces share power and riches only with a few, while we work intelligently with anyone who joins us, in the general interest of the entire population. This method of ours discourages and made some stingy, selfish and greedy people hesitate from joining us, who preferred not to register and not start working with us if they could never obtain advantages and benefits, not deserved, for oneself, one's relatives, and friends. Can we tell you a secret? For us, this attitude of theirs was very useful, and honestly very pleasant. It gives us great joy not to have stingy, selfish and greedy people with us, and we swear to you, that if they join us, they will have no chance of getting important roles if they don't deserve them.
The only usefulness, for us at DirectDemocracyS, in carefully analyzing the entire history of politics, was to see the mistakes of others, and the wrong methods, of all the various political parties, and of individual political representatives, and to learn, from their very serious mistakes, avoiding doing the same things, therefore, becoming different, and certainly better. Don't look for sins, faults, and errors in DirectDemocracyS, we are only at the beginning, and if we make small and fixable mistakes, we will be the first to find them, admit them, and solve them.
If you read this entire article with great attention, with an open mind, even several times, you will understand that for us, it was not difficult to create something better, more fair, and just, compared to everything you can find, in other political forces. And we guarantee you that we will never be able to do worse than those who preceded us, and no one, ever, will be able to create a political project better than ours. DirectDemocracyS evolves, grows, and always improves, thanks to the contribution in ideas, projects, and concrete initiatives of each person who joins us. Those who have been following us for a long time will have noticed our continuous evolution, which always makes us improve.
We will limit ourselves to general considerations, based as always on truth and indisputable facts. For every single sentence, or word, we could write a single article, to explain every single concept well, and motivate every single thing we say.
Don't start, from the first moment, to justify the political forces and ideals that you love so much. The world has many problems, because people justify the mistakes, and accept the lies, scams, programs and promises, not respected, that their political parties, and the various political representatives, have made over time. A piece of advice from us. If just once, someone you trusted betrays you and doesn't keep all their promises, never trust again, and change. This mentality, of not forgiving lies and betrayals, works for everything. For the press, and for the news channels, for the journalists, and anyone who communicates something to you. If someone has been convicted, even just once, for defamation, or for lying, never trust them again, because they will surely continue to do so. The same thing also applies to personal relationships: be demanding in regard to respect, sincerity and loyalty. Don't be afraid to do it, anyone who lies to you and betrays you, even once, will do it again. Perhaps this method of ours may seem a little cruel, but it will help you avoid many disappointments. If you are unable to do so, possibly, depending on the case, give only a second chance, without ever, for any reason, giving a third chance. For the media, if they have lied to you and defamed you, find out from other sources, perhaps comparing them, and trying to get a clear idea of the situation. Compare the various positions, with an open mind, and never think that your ideas, and your first impressions, are the best.
For the political forces, who have disappointed you, lied to you, and robbed you, the only solution is to become directly involved in the decisions of the institutions, and you can do this only with DirectDemocracyS. As for information, knowing that almost everyone has lied, defamed and made mistakes at least once, you have a simple solution: be the one to inform, through our complete, sincere, free and independent news agencies. Be yourselves, giving the news, together with anyone who joins us, always putting truth and reality first, and only then your comment, separated from the news. Always check from various reliable sources and guarantee that you do not fall into the traps of fake news just because they confirm your ideas. An open but careful mind always helps you!
As always, almost everyone who reads this will not be happy to discover that they supported political parties, movements, or groups on social networks, composed of many political representatives, who had only one goal: fame, personal wealth, and above all, to obtain by any means, the power to decide, in place of their voters. And in this case, except DirectDemocracyS (which is owned by you, and decides together with you), all the others only try to obtain your consent, and through elections, they want to obtain votes, to declare, that they have a "popular mandate", to be able to decide, based on one's own interests, and certainly not for your good. The power to decide, in a democracy, lies with the people, and not with political parties and their political representatives. Anyone who says otherwise, and there are many, is not democratic, but party-cratic.
As with everything, if anyone believes that we write false things, they can contact us (via a contact form), and as soon as possible, we will make a detailed article on everything you report to us, with all the evidence, with the sources, from which we obtained the information, and you will surely understand, that we have never written a lie, and we do not interpret history, in our favor, as everyone else does.
DirectDemocracyS, speaks directly, clearly, and simply, to intelligent people, at least above average, analyzing all the facts, always finding the errors, and always giving a solution, without any preference. In this way, we will make everyone unhappy, but no one will be able to tell us that we were wrong.
For many of you, discovering that all or part of your life you have trusted and supported those who didn't deserve it will be traumatic. Discovering the lies, manipulation and brainwashing that have made you evil, unjust, liars, thieves and without empathy will create enormous disappointment for you, because you have wasted precious time and then not obtained any improvement.
But our style and our method are these, we are not like the others, not even in the way we communicate. The truth, in many cases, hurts, and you certainly don't like having to admit it. Honestly, we're not interested in pleasing people who don't admit their bad choices. Above all, we must not like those who do not know how to change, or do not have the courage to do so.
And who doesn't vote for anyone?
Those who have no preferences, in a certain sense, are even more guilty, because they leave the power to choose to others, and therefore demonstrate that they are not interested in their own future. Many, rightly, will say that they do not feel represented, by any political party, and by any political representative. We understand them, it's not easy to know how to choose. For all of them, the alternative exists, and it is our innovation. DirectDemocracyS, requires a little time, and a little work all together, but the concrete results will be seen over time, and will make you proud of your intelligent choice.
It is not intended to be a lesson on political ideologies, nor even a "ranking" of the best and worst. For us, all political forces, except DirectDemocracyS, are complicit in the theft of power, which gives political parties, and their political representatives, the right to decide, for many years, in place of citizens. We call it by its name: oligarchic party politics. Those who represent you in the institutions, with the elections, decide on your behalf, DirectDemocracyS, on the other hand, decides everything together with you. Do you still have doubts about who is the best? Join us now.
Let's immediately clarify some basic concepts.
Each of our readers, and those who follow us, has their own preferences: right, center, left, labour, conservatives, democrats, republicans, independents, and all other political formations, there are many "political offers" for every preference. You will all have noticed that, essentially, not much changes about the old politics for whoever you vote for. DirectDemocracyS is none of these, but it is innovation, an alternative to all other political forces. Those who join us only engage in politics together with us, and bring with them only the few positive things of the political forces that they had previously supported. This exclusive, which we ask of anyone who joins us, is so logical that it does not need to be explained at this moment, but for those who want an explanation, we will make a dedicated article, as well as being able to understand the reasons, by reading our other articles.
Democracy, or dictatorship.
Authentic democracy has never existed, because it doesn't suit anyone except good people. And good people don't count for anything, even if they represent approximately 99% of the world's population.
Generally, there are only 3 possibilities.
The first is democracy (which we often talk about). The second is autocracy, which is a form of government in which a single individual holds absolute and unchallengeable power. The third is technocracy, which is an ideal of social enterprise governance, which advocates, to supervise the decision-making processes of an executive power, the direct command, or the binding opinion, of experts in the fields of hard sciences (e.g. mathematicians, physicists), soft (e.g. psychologists, economists, jurists) and technical (e.g. engineers). DirectDemocracyS is a perfect combination of the first and the third, in which real democracy is infallibly combined with technocracy, thanks to our groups of free and independent specialists. We could define ourselves as technocratic democracy or hybrid democracy. We are completely immune from autocracy, which is like a virus for other political parties. A few leaders, deciding on behalf of everyone, and for many years, this is all the old politics.
Just talk about things you know.
Unlike traditional social networks, or meeting places, where everyone talks about everything, in DirectDemocracyS, while everyone votes, in a free and democratic way, each person has the right/duty to speak, only and exclusively, of the things in which he is truly competent. Despite having free groups, in which everyone talks about everything, in our public areas, and in specialist groups, each person speaks, writes, discusses, and comments only on topics that they have studied, or in which they work, with concrete results, and recognized. This method is not liked by everyone, but it allows us to always be credible. Furthermore, to those who are interested in talking about certain topics, we give the opportunity to study them, and, after having attended very detailed courses (always organized by our groups of specialists), and after having passed an exam with flying colors (with our experts), he will be able to talk about things he knows well, without the possibility of making a bad impression.
Putting the right people in the right place is essential to be able to carry out only activities that are useful to everyone, professionally. Equality of opportunities, and meritocracy, united and guaranteed to all, continuously, allow us to be fair, equitable, and always reward the best. For us, the best are those who respect all our rules and have impeccable behavior and obtain excellent, concrete and verifiable results. Each of our members / voters, as owners of our entire political organization, of our entire website, and of all our activities, will be able to verify that every sentence and every word of our regulation is applied, respecting all our methodology.
Laziness, physical and intellectual.
Some people accuse us, rightly, that in many of our articles we repeat some basic concepts in an "exaggerated" way. Obviously, it is our conscious choice, we are not "parrots" who repeat the same things endlessly. But, like all our choices, it is based on important and logical reasons. We consider that the world is not a place where everyone lives happily, peacefully and justly for everyone. Indeed, the world we live in is often unfair. The blame, in part, is due to political systems, governed by lobbies, therefore controlled and managed, by the financial system, and by the economic system. The interests of the population do not always coincide with those of the people and of the rich and powerful commercial companies. For these reasons, the world is not an earthly paradise, but there are many problems. It would be too simple, and profoundly wrong, to find an alibi, and blame only 1% of the bad people. It is also wrong to place all the blame on politics, because politics is the exact mirror of the population, and therefore of all of us. The remaining 99%, the good people, are mainly to blame, because due to our physical and intellectual laziness, we let others decide everything that concerns us. We need advertising to choose the products and services to use, we need stylists to teach us how to dress, and "influencers" to teach us how to live. We also need current politics to decide the rules, which we will all have to respect. Likewise, we need people who think in our place, while believing, to think "with our heads". Furthermore, we have reached the point that anyone who follows logic and common sense is hated and considered "sheep following the herd", because only "against the grain" ideas give us a brief and false illusion of counting for something, in this world. Alone, with our free will, and with our brains, we decide nothing, and we need people, and political parties, to guide us. Let's be clear, we are all guilty, in the same way, only that we, by joining DirectDemocracyS, have decided not to remain passive, to suffer, all the wickedness, all the cruelty, and all the injustices. We all work hard, in a concrete and active way, to change and improve the world. Those who do not join us remain complicit, even if certain "tiny groups" pretend to fight the "system", not even having a chance to damage, change, or attack, those who have created this world for millennia, in this way. We asked many people who joined us: how many of our articles did you read before joining us? Many, too many, responded: just one article, or a couple of articles. To understand our entire project well, you must read them all, completely, even several times, and reread them every time it is necessary. Because we don't need superficial people, or those who generalize, exactly, just as we don't need lazy people, who don't get busy, directly, becoming true protagonists. For these reasons, we often repeat some fundamental concepts in many of our articles, and for these reasons, some of our articles are very long. Because we rely on the laziness of many superficial people. At the beginning, some criticized us because we wrote too many details. Our methodology, and our rules, are detailed, to prevent any incorrect use of our projects. Our "system" stands and works perfectly only if all our ideas are known and respected. For this reason, many, by partially copying us, have already failed before starting. Furthermore, many topics are connected, and many of our motivations can be understood, only by having all the information. We have written a lot, and we will write a lot more, to give you all the answers, and to waste less time answering the various questions that some rightly ask us. We also received over 20,000 messages in just one day, and we always responded to everyone. There isn't a single person who can say: I contacted them, and they didn't reply.
You shouldn't trust anyone who summarizes their "big ideas" for you in a few words.
Those who are not specific rely on the lack of desire to study and the superficiality of a large part of the population. A project in just a few lines, even if beautiful, can reserve unpleasant surprises over time. Because, with every problem that appears to you, and with every injustice you see, they will tell you: "it doesn't say anywhere that we work this way". Our advice is not to trust appearances, and study all public information carefully before joining any project.
Inside, we are exactly as you see us from the outside.
The only way to see what we are like, and to understand if you can trust us, is to join us, and you will see that everything we say is applied in reality. In a public way, you only see the "tip of the iceberg", in the private area, all activities are carried out, with discipline, order, and in safety. We don't like to depend on anyone, but we like to be free and independent, so our activities on social networks are limited to simple presence, to demonstrate that we exist, and to a few posts from time to time. We have our official website, where no one blocks us, and where we have all the necessary potential to do an excellent job.
Generalize.
In addition to not being superficial, and being open-minded, we ask anyone who joins us to never generalize, and to respect any other person, or group of people, whether internal or external. Our criticisms of all other political forces are motivated and detailed, and not generalized. Saying that all Scots are greedy, or, worse, that all Italians are mafia, and any other generalization, besides being completely wrong, is against logic, common sense, and mutual respect. For those who join us, people are only of 2 types: good or bad. Anyone who doesn't understand this can't join us! Obviously, bad people are not admitted, and if they enter, they will be harmless, and if they do not behave well, they will soon be expelled.
Let's talk about democracy.
Direct democracy, of Ancient Greece.
A Greek citizen, who joined us, said that we partly copy, with our political projects, the direct democracy of Ancient Greece, during which, in some cities, the population could vote on some decisions by take for the community. They could even decide whether to declare war on other cities. We don't copy anything from anyone, and all our ideas are original.
To vote yes or no, the Ancient Greeks had to insert a stone into an urn, and at the end, the stones were counted, and the vote was respected. Here, there is online voting, direct, safe, motivated, visible, and verifiable by anyone. Now, those who have no IT knowledge, those who understand nothing about technology, many conspiracy theorists, will tell us: online voting can be manipulated! Perhaps in other places, where there is no investment in cybersecurity, interference is possible. In DirectDemocracyS, votes cannot be manipulated, and each of our members can verify this. But they will always remain, ignorant and stupid people, who will not trust. We ask them a few simple questions: are you sure that your vote, given during the elections, which you put in the ballot box, is counted fairly? Are you sure that the vote you send by post, where it is possible to vote by post, arrives at its destination, and is counted, in the right way? Are you sure that the results published are the real ones? Nobody is sure of anything, and anyone who says they are is lying. Our method provides maximum transparency and the possibility of anyone verifying the results in real time. Perhaps we are the most attentive in the world, because each of our voters has every power of control.
What about cyberattacks?
There may be attempts to create chaos, but no one can change our results, of our votes, and no one can access the data of our users, because our computer systems are always updated, and our electronic equipment is the better, therefore the only effect that a possible cyberattack could have is to delay the vote, but we have all the security measures in place to finalize each vote, safely, within a short time. Hackers generally have morality, and would never attack a just, fair, and good project like ours. Some countries, financial and commercial companies, and some very rich and powerful people who fear us, and whom we annoy, may try to do so, but it will not be difficult for us to discover them, make them public, and respond, with intelligence and determination, with every single attempt to slow us down.
Not everyone voted in Ancient Greece.
Only free citizens voted, only males (even in "democratic" countries, female voting has only been allowed for a short time), and not just anyone was allowed to vote, slaves and the poor didn't vote, they weren't even citizens. In DirectDemocracyS, everyone votes, rich, poor, male and female, without discrimination.
Not a single citizen was allowed to propose topics and issues to be voted on. Only a limited number of people could make proposals and decide what to vote on. A bit of what happens nowadays, even in partial direct democracies, in many countries of the world, there is usually little freedom, and little willingness, to listen to everyone's opinion and proposals. In DirectDemocracyS, every single member / voter has the right to propose topics and issues to discuss, choose, debate, vote on, except violent activities, or activities that negatively impact the freedom and democracy of other people, or, of other groups of people.
In Ancient Greece, citizens with the right to vote were not informed of every detail, and did not know all the consequences, for every decision they made. A limitation of direct democracy is that not all people have the education, skills and sufficient ability to always make the best decision. Not all voters are competent on all topics. In DirectDemocracyS, free and independent specialist groups, composed of experts, with all the necessary qualifications, are active from the first minute to inform all our members / voters about the various possibilities and consequences of each decision taken. In this way, the best decision will always be made for the good of the entire population.
Voting methods, in DirectDemocracyS.
Legal numbers.
The first 3 votes, for any vote, in DirectDemocracyS, must always obtain the majority of those entitled to vote, and only from the fourth vote, we accept a result of 50% + 1 vote, of the total number of voters. With this methodology, our every choice is widely shared.
Motivation.
Every single vote must be justified, in detail, by whoever expresses his opinion. In this way, every single decision of each of our users / voters will have a solid basis, based on the competence, logic, common sense and mutual respect of all people.
Motivation is also the assumption of responsibility.
Many ask us: who is responsible, for every decision, and for every activity, in DirectDemocracyS? Thanks to the reasons for each vote expressed, we also know who is responsible for each of our decisions taken and for each of our activities. Finding the "culprits", but also rewarding, which is responsible for excellent concrete results, helps us to punish those who make mistakes, and reward those who decide for the common good.
Representative democracy.
The direct democracy of Ancient Greece is over, because it was difficult, and above all expensive, for a few people, with economic and financial interests, to convince the majority of the population to turn, based on the interests of the few rich and powerful people. Taking advantage of the fact that young people often went to war, and that women could not vote, they decided to choose a few elderly people, easily manipulated, blackmailed, weak, often sick (and therefore easily "replaceable"), for “represent the population”. By creating representative democracy, they created the greatest scam in the history of humanity. For the first forms of lobbies, it was much more convenient and simple to bribe, blackmail, threaten and eliminate, if necessary, a few elderly people than to carry out the same ethically incorrect activities with over half the population (those who they voted, with direct democracy). The fewer people decide, the less money is needed to corrupt the majority and make them decide in their favor.
You will have noticed that little, or almost nothing, has changed since then. A few people and lobbies, who control, direct, and influence in their favor almost every choice of a few political representatives.
We call it: oligarchic party politics, which has almost nothing democratic about it, except elections and a few referendums, almost always for issues chosen by the political parties and their political representatives. In many countries, proactive referendums are prohibited or very complicated to organize.
DirectDemocracyS, thanks to a simple but brilliant idea, makes representative democracy (very present in many countries) authentic democracy. With complete and absolute control by all our members/voters over their political representatives, before, during, and for the first time in the world, even after elections, we put into practice authentic democracy, that direct. Furthermore, each of our political representatives, before applying for any role, must sign an irrevocable letter of resignation due to personal problems. These resignations, anticipated and legalized, will be used by the members of the political groups from which they are candidates, our political representatives, if the latter do not respect every decision of their voters / users, of the geographical group in which they were candidates, of our website. Many call us "hybrid democracy", but we prefer to apply direct democracy, which in the future will eliminate and replace representative democracy, making politics simple, fast, efficient, economical and fair. It will not mean fewer politics, but a better, different, and above all more fair politics. At that point, DirectDemocracyS will only serve to ensure that democracy is never stolen again (by political parties), and that the population can have its wishes carried out. We always need an organization that protects freedom and democracy.
The methodology of early, irrevocable resignation for personal reasons.
We use this method in all our activities, internal and external, and not only with our political representatives. For example, our roles, of the various types of users, before obtaining a certain assignment, in our inevitable hierarchy, sign their early, irrevocable resignations for personal reasons, and in case they do not respect the decisions of the respective groups, or, depending on the case, the decisions of all our members, resignation may be made mandatory and decisive. In this way, anyone who does not respect our rules and our methodologies can be replaced with a better person, without any problem. At first glance it may seem unfair, or complicated, but it is the only way to put the right people in the right place. It avoids any type of internal struggle, and allows us to carry out every activity with loyalty and honesty.
And dictatorships?
If one has to choose between the partial and incomplete oligarchic party-cracy of many partially free states, such as the United States, and countries called "Western", the oligarchic dictatorships (as in Russia and other countries), or, the party and single thought (of China, and other countries), it is logical that fake Western democracies are preferred, and desirable, in which, at least, one has the right to oppose political regimes, and to demonstrate and protest, without fear, of being killed, tortured, injured, and imprisoned.
There are stupid and ignorant people who would prefer certain and absolute evil to partial good, just because they believe that with regime changes, even incapable people could obtain important roles.
We tell everyone clearly: it's not that by shuffling and re-dealing the cards, you get better cards. Those who are ignorant, incompetent, and stupid, in the partial and incomplete "Western" democracies, do not automatically become educated, competent, and intelligent, with dictatorships, whatever they are.
The only difference would be that from a partial freedom, you get austerity in exchange, and therefore you wouldn't even have the chance to complain.
Knowing how to distinguish between partial good and complete evil is one of the qualities that we require from anyone who joins us.
Oligarchic dictatorship.
In Russia, and in a few other countries, a single man in power has given to his frontmen (completely incapable people, and without any merit), all the riches of their country, and has put his "puppets" to manage all the institutions. With absolute control, he destroyed all oppositions, rendering them harmless and practically non-existent, killing, torturing and imprisoning many political representatives of the few opposition parties. Very few people, without any qualities, have all the power, living an expensive life, while the majority of the population struggles to survive. Russian politics is totally controlled, with very violent and cruel methods, by President Vladimir Putin, who has surrounded himself with incapable but faithful enough people, hoping not to end up like many dictators and oppressive regimes, who over time, they have followed one another in the history of man. The difference between DirectDemocracyS, and the oligarchic dictatorial regime, is immense. First, we are morphologically created, to prevent dictatorships, and thanks to innovative and very clear rules and methodologies, we prevent a single man, and a single group, from having all the power, but also simply, from have too much power. Secondly, in DirectDemocracyS, there is shared leadership, where everything is decided together. Furthermore, equality and meritocracy are guaranteed, always both, over time, and always together. Russian citizens have gone from the inequality and corruption of the tsarist period, to the false equality, austerity, and completely wrong choices of the communist dictatorship, and then, to the tragic post-Soviet period, in which Putin and his subordinates took everything the power. A real shame, for Russian citizens, for their politics, and for Vladimir Putin, who missed the opportunity to demonstrate that he loves his country, and his people, and not just their riches. Russia, instead of maintaining good relations with the countries that made up the former Soviet Union, has often exploited, blackmailed, threatened, invaded and bombed sister countries, even those to which it had sworn to guarantee security, territorial integrity, independence and sovereignty. He created vile invasions, death, pain, suffering and fear, in Chechnya, in Georgia, and in Ukraine, finding frivolous motives, being believed, in Russia and in the world, only by a few ignorant and stupid people. Furthermore, Russian policy has negatively influenced many other countries. For these reasons, all the countries close to Russia have requested to join the European Union, and above all NATO. The unreliability and ongoing threat of Russian politics has been the cause of many problems. Obviously, there are those who do not understand anything, who justify the pain caused to other peoples, but also to their own people, by a dictatorial and unjust policy. These people, politically worthless, are vile, and are on the side of the "bully", and not on the side of those who are "bullied". They are calling for an “end to the war” by stopping helping Ukraine defend itself, for economic reasons. Fighting for one's freedom, for one's independence, is fundamental for every human being, and helping those who defend themselves, by any means, from invasions is a duty of every person of common sense. Not giving weapons to those who defend themselves coincides with the help, certainly not involuntary, and certainly not disinterested, to the aggressor, allowing him to subjugate the people who have attacked in a cowardly way. DirectDemocracyS loves every population on earth in exactly the same way, and will always be on the side of those who suffer, those who are attacked, and will never be on the side of those who cause violence. Whoever invades, and whoever creates deaths, injuries, suffering, fear, and destruction, is our adversary, and is guilty of crimes against humanity. The United States has made many mistakes, and even crimes, in their history (just look at the dictatorships, favored in many countries of the world, the embargoes that starve entire populations, to create tensions and coups d'état), but they, and the NATO (which is a defensive alliance), have never attacked and threatened their own members, and have never invaded neighboring countries, which they were sworn to defend. But we have many articles, which clearly explain all our international positions. Unlike many other corrupt and blackmailable political forces, DirectDemocracyS is free, independent, neutral, and is always on the right side of history, and on the side of those who suffer. We can, for example, condemn every attack by Hamas and other terrorist organizations against other countries, and we can condemn Israel's disproportionate and equally criminal response towards the Palestinian population. DirectDemocracyS has no debts, owes no favors to anyone, and is not afraid to condemn, investigate, and prosecute every single person who causes deaths, injuries, and pain. We have also presented our simple, fast, efficient, and definitive solutions to all major conflicts. Peace in the world is our prerogative. All over the world.
Party and single thought.
In China, and in a few other countries, there is only one party in power, and an obligation for everyone to have "a single thought", generally, of a communist party. We all know that communism is a utopia, and has very "flexible" rules, regarding the principle of equality. A party member has privileges and advantages that make all socialist and communist philosophers "turn in their graves". The difference between DirectDemocracyS, and the dictatorial one-party regime, and single thought, is immense. We are, for authentic democracy, and for absolute freedom, which must be potentially infinite, but end only where democracy and the freedom of another person, or another group of people, begin. A single party, with a single thought, is unthinkable for us, because DirectDemocracyS is unity, in diversity. We will never carry out activities to make other political forces disappear, but we will think about our work.
Therefore, we have seen how much injustice exists in dictatorships, in which single leaders and single parties surround themselves only with incompetent but faithful people who follow orders, without allowing themselves to criticize. They choose incompetent and weak people so as not to risk having potential adversaries over time. Competition and internal struggles are the greatest fears of authoritarian regimes. There is no freedom to oppose.
Putin, and other similar dictators, try in every way to appear as nationalists and exploit the fears of their fellow citizens. They hope for a return to the past, for some, the dream of the return by force of the Soviet Union (which is impossible), for others, they hope for the glory and pomp of the Russian Empire, equally impossible to achieve. To gain the support of stupid and ignorant people for the Russian dictator, it is enough to talk about Nazism, and the former communists immediately accept all his despicable activities. Everyone will have understood that we do not accept dictatorships, and we want citizens to decide, and not political parties and their political representatives.
But we also talk about dictatorships, and the Nazi, fascist and communist regimes, because they are still around, nostalgic for these regimes, which were criminal, unjust, and caused, above all, death, pain and suffering.
Nazism and fascism, we treat them together, because they were very similar. Both had a false love for their country, had delusions of grandeur, and tried in every way to maintain power. They did it, with criminal actions and cruelty, not worthy of human beings. They manipulated and distorted history, and took advantage of the fears of their citizens. The horrors of Nazism and fascism, we all know them, have exterminated Jews, gypsies, homosexuals, and even people with disabilities for years.
Fortunately, these regimes are dead along with their leaders. Hitler and Mussolini met the end they deserved, due to their wrong choices. The few, who today are inspired by their ideas, have no chance of obtaining consensus, for the simple reason that people's average education has on average grown, empathy has increased, and people's mentality is also different, and certainly better.
Let's stop defining political representatives as "statesmen".
Hitler and Mussolini, like all dictators, caused many problems for many people, defining them as "statesmen" is a very serious mistake. They're called criminals. The same goes for other historical figures, whom some ignorant people take inspiration from, not all of them dictators, but who have caused enormous injustices, public debt, and wrong laws.
Another regime, which was based on ignorance, is communism. Many will feel offended, especially those few who believe that culture and education are a prerogative of the "left". History clearly demonstrates the truth in this case. To clarify the concept, the many "communists" and "intellectuals" on the left must answer, honestly, these 2 questions: who was communist philosophy aimed at in the early 1900s? The only possible answer is: to the working class. Our second question is: in the early 1900s, and in the following years, what job did they do, who didn't have education, and who didn't have much culture? The only possible answer is: he worked in a factory. But then, the communists created schools and universities, certainly not to create culture, but to manipulate and brainwash the less wealthy social classes.
After the Second World War, with fascism and Nazism dead and buried, a division was needed to motivate many illicit activities, many "cold" wars, or real wars, coups d'état, and revolts, in many countries, with many crimes. Western countries, and the United States, had to be contrasted with countries under Soviet influence with communist regimes, often declared socialist, based on statism.
Capitalism and statism.
DirectDemocracyS has always been, and will always be, pro-democracy, and pro-freedom, including the freedom to design and create, for all people. For us, the State must be the referee, and not the player. Statism creates a feeling of fake social equity, but instead, it creates injustice, economic recession, absence of meritocracy, and lack of innovation.
Surely, there will be many people, who will dispute the previous sentence, they are the ones who want proof.
Here's the proof. We look at the standard of living, the level of innovation, and the well-being of the West, the United States, and the capitalist countries, and the communist and statist regimes, of Eastern Europe, of 1989-1990. We have witnessed the collapse of regimes under communist and statist dictatorships, which have imploded on themselves. People could not resist the lack of freedom, poverty, corruption, manipulation and backwardness of very rich but very badly governed countries. Specialists say that communism and statism have created a progress gap of at least 50 years between Western capitalist countries and communist/statist countries.
In this regard, let's make a small parenthesis.
At the end of the Second World War, Western countries received billions of US dollars from the United States, through the Marshall Plan, to get their economies back on their feet. Despite many subsequent advantages, for the United States, in the following years, in the West there was freedom, partial democracy, innovation and modernity. The USA allowed and favored the birth of the European Economic Community, and here, we will receive criticism from those who are against everything, and against everyone, but we will also respond to you in this and other articles. And the countries “liberated” by the Red Army? For many years, they were exploited and stripped of much wealth by the Soviet Union, which justified its actions as exploitation as payment for "war debts". Receiving nothing in return, except invasions and violence (in Hungary and Czechoslovakia), but also the total lack of freedom. As already written, but we want to underline it, in communist and statist countries, they were 50 years behind (stopped after the war) compared to Western progress. No wealth, no innovation, no equity, no justice, and no freedom.
The Soviet Union, without the intervention of the United States in Europe, almost certainly would no longer have existed towards the end of the Second World War. While respecting the counter-offensive of the Red Army's liberation of a good part of Europe, without the "very bad Americans", the Russians today, like much of Europe, would speak German. We do not know that Russia has paid a single ruble to thank the USA.
This is to make you understand that history must be analyzed at 360 degrees, and not by selecting only the few things that support our thesis. Everything changes if you study everything with an open mind!
Wild capitalism and globalization are not perfect, and must be changed and improved, but they are always better than communism and statism. The former can be modified as needed, the latter cannot be improved. There will always be a capitalism that is more attentive to the less wealthy classes, but there will never be a communism and statism that creates equality, meritocracy, economic growth and innovation.
Anyone who reads this article, and has always been a communist, will think that communism creates equality. So, for these ignorant people, in communism, citizens are all the same.
We answer you with a question: do you know the difference between a member of the communist party and a normal citizen in those countries? Ask for the answer from those who have lived and really know the situation in Eastern European countries, and not from those who have seen the propaganda videos, which some stupid people from many Western countries believed, and that they were false, and based on lies. An example: who could leave an Eastern country? Only a party member, and not with his entire family, but someone, a family member, had to stay at home, to be able to blackmail anyone who went out, with the hope of escaping. The passport, for traveling abroad, was issued only for a period of time limited to a single trip (then it had to be returned), it was valid only for the first Eastern European country on the border, and it was rarely possible to go to the countries Westerners. Many members of the communist party, in some cases, went to Western countries, and returned with legends, such as "Westerners eat cats and dogs", because in their ignorance, in preserves and animal foods, there were animals photographed on the packaging, certainly not animal food. They who knew that meat for citizens was often made up of chicken legs and heads, and that they couldn't always be found, and people had to queue for hours to buy them. Everyone was always walking around, with shopping bags, always ready, in case something was found.
Another example, from one of our official members, who lived in a Western country. Having his grandparents in an Eastern country, he went to Romania on holiday. His grandmother had sent him to get 2 pieces of bread so that we could all eat together. Arriving at the shop, after 2 and a half hours in line, the sales assistant gave our young member 1 piece of bread, and upon requesting a second piece of bread, he was told: do you want another piece of bread, do queue a second time, because there is little bread, and there has to be enough for everyone. With the risk of losing 2 and a half hours, and not finding another piece of bread available. All right, fair, and correct, if our young member had not seen a member of the communist party pass by the back of the shop, and immediately receive 3 pieces of bread. Without standing in line, without any limits, and without paying, but only because he was a member of the communist party. A member of the communist party didn't have to wake up at 5 in the morning to get in line to buy a liter of milk for his children, and he didn't have to stand in line for hours to get the 10 liters of petrol, to which they were entitled to it in a month. For many years, everything was rationalized, and could only be bought with shopping vouchers. 100 g of butter per person, per month, 1 liter of oil per person per month, bananas almost never present, and oranges only for Christmas, with purchase limits. Only one gas cylinder per month, for each family, and if the gas ran out, you had to wait until the following month. Restrictions, and laws, which also prevented satire or telling jokes about the party leader. They shot those who tried to escape in the back, women had clandestine abortions, risking death, but it was better than having their children live as slaves and undernourished. The long decades of communism and statism have created generations of people accustomed to the fact that for every service they had to pay the price, plus something more, to thank those who had simply carried out their duty. A black market, among the poor, where you could find a pair of Blue Jeans if you paid a month's salary for work. He tipped himself for everything. Corruption, inequality, and total lack of meritocracy, this is communism and statism. The only ones who regret these regimes are some of those who did not know and experience them, or those few party members, accomplices, who lost privileges that they did not deserve.
At this point, many will ask themselves the following question.
Is communism, therefore, all wrong for DirectDemocracyS?
Communism was useful, especially at the beginning, because it rightly asked for protections for workers, and for some civil battles, but the price to pay for humanity was millions of deaths, and hundreds of millions of people, who lived in an inhumane manner. Seeing, then, the level of corruption of certain unions, often the advantages obtained also brought many disadvantages.
But why is statism a failure? And isn't equality desirable?
Statism, which many believe makes everyone equal, is inconceivable, for the simple reason, that it kills innovation. If all people who carry out a certain task are paid exactly the same, what sense does it make for a brilliant person to create something good if he knows that his superior will take the credit? The inevitable hierarchies, in which those who are above have unlimited power, and collude with those who are even above, put simple people in impossible situations. Many brilliant people have died, trying to escape from unjust and cruel regimes. The equality and meritocracy that DirectDemocracyS guarantees, always together, for everyone, at all times, makes us infallible and ethically correct.
Equality and the redistribution of wealth.
If we calculated, out of curiosity, all the riches of our planet, and divided them among all the citizens of the earth, perhaps we would obtain, for example, a million dollars per person. If we gave every person their million dollars, many people would make bad investments, and many other people would spend them on futile things, and then never have another chance. Many would gamble, or make poor financial choices, and over time become a burden on society. There would be few people capable of investing their capital in order to make it grow and create more wealth for other people.
And therefore, the poor must remain poor, and the rich must become richer and richer?
For us at DirectDemocracyS, politics must solve all the problems of all people, always helping the people and commercial companies most in difficulty first. This does not mean welfare, it does not mean giving "a fish" to eat from time to time, but teaching citizens to fish, helping them, perhaps with a fishing rod, and what is necessary to get fish themselves. In this way, we give everyone dignity, hope, and meaning to their lives, without just creating debt, to give away from time to time, the bare minimum to survive. For DirectDemocracyS, no one should be left behind, but elections cannot be won by giving money away and making promises which will then not be sustainable and will create a lot of debt for future generations. We have many solutions, some innovative, and for the good of all. We want a different, better world, in which everyone can live a peaceful and happy life with dignity.
Make a just, equitable and innovative policy.
We all know the main social classes, which can then be divided into other micro social classes.
But let's start immediately from the obligation, not to be superficial, and never generalize.
The rich are not all bad, and the poor are not all good. The middle class is not perfect.
The rich, in turn, are divided into other categories. Who is rich, because he had a brilliant idea, and therefore had merit. Those who are rich, with ethically correct methods, which for us, are those who have enriched themselves, legally, honestly, without exploiting workers, and without polluting the planet. Then there are those who simply got lucky. Who got rich, thanks to his parents, or his ancestors. And then, there are greedy, evil, cruel, unscrupulous people who seek wealth and power, using unfair means.
The middle class is practically the class to be exploited by the old political forces, because it is the only one that is balanced between wealth and poverty. Many declare that they want to help the middle class, but due to inability, or lack of courage, almost all of them do not help the middle class continuously. With current policies, more and more people from the middle class end up in poverty, while the rich, the enormously rich, become even richer. Focusing on the middle class, to relaunch the economy, on a global level, is the only way forward to create development. But it is a difficult road to travel, because there are many situations that need to change and improve.
The poor are the easiest to manipulate, and the most desperate ones, who trust anyone who creates situations of revenge for them, which then concretely bring only disorder and few concrete results. Being poor is not a fault, but it must be a temporary situation. Anyone can have financial problems and situations of poverty. The task of serious political forces is to offer all the means, for everyone, to move into the middle class, and with time and with hard work, to get rich. Utopias? No, we have all the projects ready, and you will see a social redemption, which was only promised by some, and only before the elections.
Let's not do Robin Hood politics.
We do not intend to make the richest, poorest, if they have obtained their riches in ethically correct ways. But anyone who has obtained even a single dollar without deserving it must fear us.
Our greatest challenge is to make all those who deserve it richer, leaving no one behind. And this can only be achieved with simple, clear laws respected by all, without any exceptions. Our solutions, on an economic and financial level, are certainly the only ones capable of changing and improving everyone's lives, except those who don't deserve it. Therefore, DirectDemocracyS does not steal from the rich to give to the poor, but puts all the poor in a position to become richer.
There are entire books in which all the old ideologies of the past have been studied, such as communism, fascism, and Nazism. We talked about them, quickly, and not in detail. For example, nationalism, the fact of loving your country, is not a defect, if you do it while respecting everyone else. Many communist sympathizers have accused us of being too critical of their ideal, which is a utopia and is certainly a failure. But if you read each of our articles, you will realize that some small positive parts of communism, combined with love for our planet, for our continents, for our countries, and for all territorial areas, and for all the geographical subdivisions, which is typical of nationalists, make DirectDemocracyS, the only ideal, politically perfect, because it takes, and intelligently unites, every small positive part of every ideology of the past, eliminating every small negative part.
DirectDemocracyS is the only meritocratic communism (in our country equality and meritocracy exist, continuous over time, and always together), but also the only capitalism "with a human face". It is not just a play on words, but a true innovation, financial and economic, capable of creating more wealth for everyone.
Wild capitalism, and globalization.
There are many injustices, even in capitalism, but they cannot be solved with statism. DirectDemocracyS believes that the State not only can intervene, but must obligatorily intervene, in a provisional but efficient way, to "save the population", in certain situations of serious crises, and then give the task back to private individuals, to carry on the work. Wild capitalism and globalization create intolerable imbalances and social inequalities in many cases. Furthermore, they create financial crises, which then create a domino effect, with ever-increasing public debt. This is not normal, it is not logical, and it is not common sense. We have many concrete projects to create a fair and equitable capitalism, some are already active, and others will be in the future.
The work.
We don't talk much about it, but our employment policies are like our political organization, innovative and alternative. Having a decent and safe job for everyone, in which there is all the potential to improve one's situation, is one of the pillars on which our structure is based.
Before continuing, let's talk about the small groups, born with social networks, who try in vain to copy us, or who have the false presumption of considering themselves better than us.
With all due respect, they cannot be better, fairer, more equitable, or more innovative than us, mainly for 3 reasons, very simple, and others more complex.
The first reason, is that DirectDemocracyS, was created, and continues to innovate, and evolve, thanks to some of the most competent people in the world, and thanks also, to every person who joins us, who in the initial stages, is chosen and accepted, thanks to a very careful and severe selection process. If we had started by accepting everyone from the first minute, we would have already finished our business.
The second reason is that anyone who creates something, even without realizing it, hopes to obtain wealth and power, and certainly does not want to change and improve the world. Everyone thinks of having the control of "his" political force in his own hands, and in his own brain, not accepting better and more competent people within him, for fear of losing his own power, and his own right to decide. DirectDemocracyS, is the exclusive and complete property of anyone who joins us. Each person has the same duties and rights as everyone else, without any preference, except for the concrete results obtained, and respect for our methodology and all our rules. Shared leadership, in which no decisions are made by a single person, or a single group of people. This methodology, unique in the world, allows us to avoid having internal struggles, splits, or waste of time.
The third reason is that we are not against others, we are not anti-system, or anti-politics. For every new political force, especially at the beginning, to fight against a financial and economic system, which they control and influence, every political party, and through the various traditional political forces, they control and influence, every political representative, for many years, would be a real "suicide". The only intelligent method, and one that really works, is to enter the "system" and create real innovation. Not a fight, lost from the start, but a new path that we can travel together. In this regard, do you really believe that seeing the "revolutions" of the past, the "system" has not taken precautionary measures to prevent any change and improvement? DirectDemocracyS is innovation, an alternative to all other political forces. It is a phrase that we often repeat, but that no one can dispute, because it is the truth.
Let's see what the "revolutionary" groups offer.
They offer you the false sensation of being able to be protagonists, and they delude you into thinking with "your head", while the protagonists will be their leaders, and you will think with their heads.
Create divisions, to attract small groups.
This method, used by all the old political forces, creates some poor immediate consensus, only to then fail miserably. Anyone who joins DirectDemocracyS knows that only with unity, with respect for every rule, and with an infallible methodology, can concrete and long-lasting results be achieved.
Social hatred.
Obtaining consensus by creating social hatred and exploiting the ignorance and envy of the people you are addressing is ethically wrong and only creates problems. People, however stupid and ignorant, over time understand the scam, and the consensus turns into "a handful of sand". Even nowadays, there are political forces, various movements, and groups, which base their only chances of having some votes on social hatred, on manipulation, on brainwashing, on fake news, of people, incapable of distinguishing good from evil, what is right from what is wrong, and above all what is true from what is false. We, in DirectDemocracyS, are not interested in hatred, we prefer union, in diversity, to divisions.
Fake news, and conspiracies.
Creating fake news, and conspiracies, to attract small groups, creates some truly varied groups, with 0 possibility of collaborating and uniting. Not only because no mini leader does not want to lose their privileges, but also because each small group believes that their "theories" are more important than the others.
Let's make a brief parenthesis.
The ancients believed that the drawings in the caves were reality, and the truth, because it was clearer, and remained imprinted for longer (some drawings have also reached us, after millennia), compared to the words, called orally. Then someone realized that by modifying reality, advantages could be obtained, and they drew archaic maps, in which they made some people believe that the prey to be hunted was in a certain place, and not where they actually were the animals. In this way, those who lied had enormous advantages, and those who followed the wrong directions wasted time and often died of hunger. Since then, nothing has changed!
With writing (papyri and manuscripts), and with the press (books and newspapers), all information spread more quickly, but in the same way as in the Stone Age, truth and lies were mixed, and it was difficult to distinguish what was right from what was wrong. But even then, there were people who said, with absolute certainty: it's definitely true, I read it in a book. Books, like drawings in caves, are not absolute truths, it depends on the authors, and on the "usual" interests.
With radio and television, “absolute reality” became more direct, the truth and lies were audible and visible, and therefore the impact was even more devastating, and the consequences often catastrophic. The people who had access to the information were amazed at how many things were happening in the world, believing, superficially, and without any certain statistical data, that the world is always getting worse. Knowing more news does not always equate to a greater number of negative events, simply, a more immediate diffusion, and a greater number of sources of information, deceives ignorant people that the world is getting worse. There were always people who said, with absolute certainty: it's definitely true, I heard it on the radio, and subsequently, the absolute truth is on TV, because it can be seen and no one can deny it! As always, the sources of information can tell the truth or lie, it depends, as always, on the authors and on the "usual" interests.
In the Bible, and in many Sacred Texts, it is written: the devil will mix the truth with lies to create confusion. And people, the weak, uneducated, often proud, with such a mass of information, have had considerable difficulty in distinguishing good from evil, what is right, from what is wrong, and above all, as our ancestors, did not distinguish truth from lies.
Another parenthesis must be made on the amount of information.
As the amount of news increases, and as it arrives in real time, it may seem to people with few functioning neurons that the world is heading towards self-destruction. Unfortunately, even when there was less news, and it didn't arrive immediately, therefore in the past, violence, pain and suffering existed. Just because I didn't know everything that happened didn't mean there weren't any disgusting facts. We often read phrases like this on social networks: but what kind of world do we live in? Or comments like: we deserve extinction. These people, stupid and ignorant, who believe that before things were better, and now everyone is bad, should avoid making everyone aware of their inability to formulate complex sentences, and stop speaking in banal and useless slogans. . Furthermore, wishing for the extinction of humanity, and therefore also of billions of innocent people, because few people are bad, is more cruel than those who make one, or a few, people suffer. Sometimes, silence prevents us from making a bad impression.
With the Internet, and with social networks, the information, and the method of dissemination, became enormous, and each person found other people, or groups of people, willing to confirm each theory. Every thought, even bizarre and illogical, found confirmation from other people, equally bizarre, and not equipped with common sense and logic.
But let's clarify things straight away. A theory, even if confirmed by many people, without scientific evidence, and without reliable sources, still remains a theory.
Another parenthesis, the official sources.
The story, like any news, has official sources and unreliable sources. For example, the ancient Romans, and almost all historians, distorted history, almost always in favor of those who were in power, and could bring them immediate benefits, while alive, and not when dead. Fortunately, some of them hid, until their deaths, the evidence in which the truth was also documented, and not just the "truth that brought them advantages". Many historical figures, thanks to concrete evidence, have been reevaluated.
Currently, things have not changed, the official information and the "alternative" one accuse each other of lying. Sometimes, the official sources made mistakes and lied, making a terrible impression. Immediately those who "think with their heads" were born (even if, in reality, one does not think with the head, but with the brain, their heads are often empty, and a large head is not enough to also have a big brain, functioning), who dispute every official statement. To the slogan of: you made a mistake and lied once, you always do it. For these people, however, the alternative theses, often without scientific confirmation and without reliability, are truer than the official ones. They believe that everything and every information in the “system” is false, and that anyone who believes in normal sources of information is a sheep following the herd. The manipulated, who consider other people manipulated, are one of the worst evils in the world.
Distinguish truth from lies.
If you do not have the right education, and groups of free and independent specialists, it is difficult to distinguish the truth from lies. DirectDemocracyS, from the first minute, attracted many experts, who created our groups of specialists, composed of many of our members, with documentation, which attests to their skills and competences, which in turn attracted other specialists, creating thousands of groups, for each topic, to be able to have all the information, to be able to decide in an informed way, knowing all the various possibilities, and the consequences, of every decision we make, all together. Thanks to all our experts, who allow us to prevent any problem, and allow us to be credible.
For those who do not have our groups of specialists, it is practically impossible to know what is true and what is false. In general, we have the wrong and stupid tendency to trust only those who confirm our ideas. If a person has a theory that doesn't stand up, which often contrasts with reality, he will tend to join groups in which there are people who think the same way. In these groups, he will feel at ease, because he thinks: if other people have similar ideas, it will surely be the truth. As we have already said, the fact that many, or very many, people have the same theory does not make it authentic and real.
So, how should we behave?
The only solution is to believe one thing, until proven otherwise, and be open-minded. Consult various sources.
Manipulation, and brainwashing.
Those who have "alternative" theories often rely on the past, in which many innovative ideas, by intelligent people, were then confirmed by reality. The great discoveries were made thanks to someone who thought differently. But this method, nowadays, does not always work, because research, education, and science, for better, and occasionally for worse, have made enormous progress. Nowadays, wrong theories are quite simple to debunk, with a scientific method, based on logic, common sense, and competence. Usually, admitting your mistakes, and recognizing that you have had wrong ideas, is not easy, and almost no one is capable of correcting themselves. Even in the face of evidence, theories that make no sense continue to be supported. It would be simpler, and useful for everyone, to think of something else. So, are we all manipulated, and brainwashed? There are no doubts. The only freedom we have, as individuals and as groups, is to choose who we let ourselves be manipulated by, and we can choose who to believe. Those who are always against all official information, stating that those who trust the "system" are manipulated, on many occasions, are right, but almost always wrong. Certainly, those who, due to their lack of education, only trust "alternative" sources are more manipulated and subjected to greater brainwashing. The answer often lies in statistics, numbers never lie. Official sources are sometimes wrong, but they are almost always real. Alternative sources are almost always wrong, and only occasionally are they right. It's a simple question of numbers that any of us must honestly admit.
Manipulation, and brainwashing, are inevitable, both on the part of the “system” and on the part of “alternative” theories. The system has greater credibility, in its imperfection. The alternatives base their survival on hatred towards the system, and the fear that there are interested in the extermination of the world population. At this point, justifying everything on the basis of fear is perhaps the worst manipulation, because it makes the life of those who believe in certain things truly senseless and squalid.
And DirectDemocracyS, manipulates, and brainwashes, its members/voters?
DirectDemocracyS, has no need to manipulate anyone, and we are not interested in brainwashing anyone. It would be counterproductive for us to have "lobotomized" users without critical thinking. We believe the official sources, and immediately verify them, before accepting them. We also believe in all "alternative" theories, and immediately test them before accepting them. Every single one of our members / voters can propose ideas, theories and projects, which will be analyzed, chosen, discussed, possibly modified and finally voted on. The majority wins, based on our very complex, free, and democratic voting system. When a decision is made, and it is final, it must be official, for everyone in DirectDemocracyS. Obviously, everyone can continue to believe what they want, but if we are talking about an official position, the one taken, with our vote, is definitive, binding, and must be supported by all our members / voters, by anyone who joins to us. Nothing prevents anyone from continuing to do research, to find other evidence, and reliable sources, which can be presented and voted on at any time, as has been done previously. Having an open mind is essential to always be on the right side and to be credible. In a future article, we will present to you our vote on a trivial but important question to better understand how our "system" works.
We will soon make some detailed articles on current society, on how people use technology and social networks. And we will inform you of many other things. We will also do an article, very funny, but also very sad, on some falsehoods that some "hypothesize", on DirectDemocracyS. Some people certainly don't lack imagination. We inform you with great pleasure, and we are sure that we will always know how to do it in the best way.
DirectDemocracyS is not anti-politics, but is for a different and better politics, in which every person becomes a protagonist.
Our method will not please those who love to be commanded by others, and those who are too lazy, and those who prefer that others decide for them. For DirectDemocracyS, it is people who have to choose which world to live in.
Finally, those who are incompetent and ignorant do not like DirectDemocracyS, because equality and meritocracy, always united and guaranteed together, forever over time, do not allow those who do not know how to do anything useful to obtain advantages and facilities, which he rightly doesn't deserve.
For everyone else, we are and will always be here!
I remind you that immediately after the transfer, all activity on this website will be completely cancelled.
Comments (1)
